Oracle attacks Open Source


Oracle has a love-hate relationship with open source technologies.  In a whitepaper (PDF) for the Department of Defense, Oracle claims that TCO (total cost of ownership) goes up with the use of open source. They’re essentially trying to build a case for the use of their own products within the government.

Oracle also attacks the community-based development model, calling it more insecure than company developed products. ‘Government-sponsored community development approaches to software creation lack the financial incentives of commercial companies to produce low-defect, well-documented code.’

The Oracle claims appear to be somewhat based on over-generalisation, as – for instance - The open-source PostgreSQL project has the best documentation of a software project around, open- or closed-source. Other open-source projects with really good documentation: The Linux man pages (documenting the Linux API), Tcl/Tk and Perl. And as far as end-user docs go, LibreOffice is fairly decent, though not in the same league as PostgreSQL.

Oracle may have a number of official and unofficial books available which serve as documentation, but this merely prompts the question: if a user needs a mile of bookshelves simply to be able to use your product, where did things go wrong?

Perhaps what Oracle really meant was, “Unlike proprietary, hidden commercial code, Government-sponsored back doors in software can’t be found in the traditional, open-source, many-eyes, well-documented code.”

But that kind of statement won’t facilitate raking in the profits.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Comments are closed.

Linux software

Linux news

Subscribe

Polls

What type of Cloud infrastructure are you currently using, or going to use?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...